Police will get much easier access to the web-surfing habits and personal information of all Canadians if a new law - expected to be introduced in the House of Commons next week - passes.

They also do not have to give reasons for the need for information relating to a subscribers personal data. I guess Canada gets what it deserves? If the police have reasonable grounds for illegal online activity, they can get a warrant, not go on phishing expeditions by snooping in the computers of ordinary Canadians. However Canadians, like fluffy lambs will be led to the slaughter of privacy .. and like it

At issue is the government's "lawful access" legislation tabled in the House of Commons on Tuesday. The last nail in the Canadian media coffin perhaps?

The legislation, newly branded by the government as the Protecting Children from Internet Predators Act, but dubbed "online spying" by critics, is expected to pass under a Conservative majority government.

Privacy watchdogs caution if the so-called Lawful Access law is passed, it would give police access to web-browsing history and sensitive personal information, and would grant greater permission to track the cellular phones of suspects - much of it without the requirement of a warrant.

The bill, which is on the order paper for this week, would require Internet service providers and cellular phone companies to install equipment that would monitor users' activities so that the information could be turned over to police when requested.

It would also grant greater permission to law enforcement authorities to activate tracking mechanisms within cellphones so they can follow the whereabouts of suspected criminals. Its seems all suspects are guilty before the law. BIG BROTHER IS JUST AROUND THE CORNER If there is a suspicion of terrorist activity, the law would allow such tracking to go on for a year, rather than the current 60-day limit.

This isn't the first time this law has been introduced. The most recent incarnation of the Lawful Access bill died on the order paper when the federal election was called last year.

Public Safety Minister Vic Toews said the law will give the tools to police to adequately deal with 21st-century technology, and said anyone opposing the laws favours "the rights of child pornographers and organized crime ahead of the rights of lawabiding citizens."

However, Canada's privacy commissioner raised a red flag about the law late last year, writing a letter to Toews saying she was concerned about the permission it will grant police.

"In the case of access to subscriber data, there is not even a requirement (in the bill) for the commission of a crime to justify access to personal information - real names, home addresses, unlisted numbers, email addresses, IP addresses and much more - without a warrant," Jennifer Stoddart wrote.

"Only prior court authorization provides the rigorous privacy protection Canadians expect."

Michael Geist, a law professor at the University of Ottawa and an outspoken critic of the law, said he's worried about all the information police will be able to obtain without a warrant. "The ability to use that kind of information in a highly sensitive way without any real oversight is very real," Geist said.

As an example of the new powers, Geist said authorities would be able to use equipment to find the cellphone numbers of people attending a protest, and then be able to ask a cellphone company to disclose personal information on the people linked to those phones. Police could then track their web behaviours and monitor their movements by tracking their cellphones.

Geist said Canadians should also be concerned that the information obtained by police here could be shared with their counterparts around the world.

Geist added this could also be a tremendous waste of money, because ISPs would be required to spend a lot to put in place the advanced monitoring infrastructure proposed. "One thing (the government) has never provided is the evidence to show how the current set of laws has stymied investigations or created a significant barrier to ensure that we're safe in Canada."

He argued recent investigations into child pornography and the Sûreté du Québec's recent tapping of BlackBerry Messenger communication to make an arrest of suspected mobsters in a murder case in Montreal show the current laws already work well.